[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] OSGI Manifest
|
Hi Eric,
Yes... We should be importing all packages that we depend on that the spec
does not define as available as part of the Framework. It is worth entering a
bug for this.
I suspect that the reason we have not seen an error yet is that in our
environment the loading of javax.sql classes is delegated to the boot class loader.
As a workaround, try adding javax.sql to your
org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation list. I believe it is set using a System
property.
The spec uses this example:
org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=sun.*,com.sun.*
-Tom
Eric Gulatee wrote:
Tom,
- SpringDM which uses equinox under the covers.
- Java 1.6 build 105 from SUN.
Well, correct me if I'm wrong (I may very well be, I'm green/wet behind
the ears on OSGI), wouldn't the eclipselink jpa 1.1 bundle still need to
import the javax.sql package even if it's part of the JDK?
[I get failures when building my own app using mvn-bnd-plugin and
deploying if javax.sql wasn't import since I'm using a datasource]
Cheers,
Eric G.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Eric,
What JVM are you using? What OSGI framework are you using?
Our testing has mainly been on Sun JDK 1.5 and 1.6 VMs using
Equinox. In that environment, we get the DataSource class from the
VM itself.
-Tom
Eric Gulatee wrote:
Defect opened.
Thanks for the prompt response. And for correcting the verbiage.
I'm following the POC as a baseline for eclipselink + osgi, and
I'm getting the following error when I create my own activator.
(I'm trying with eclipselink 1.1-M2)
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/sql/DataSource
at
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.deployment.PersistenceUnitProcessor.processPersistenceXML(PersistenceUnitProcessor.java:361)
at
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.deployment.PersistenceUnitProcessor.processPersistenceArchive(PersistenceUnitProcessor.java:314)
at
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.deployment.PersistenceUnitProcessor.getPersistenceUnits(PersistenceUnitProcessor.java:237)
at
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.deployment.JPAInitializer.initPersistenceUnits(JPAInitializer.java:146)
at
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.deployment.JPAInitializer.initialize(JPAInitializer.java:135)
I don't see the import for javax.sql in the eclipselink jpa osgi
1.1-M2 bundle. I'm not sure if that's intentional or not. Or If
I've done something wrong :)
Cheers,
Eric G.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
Hi Eric,
You are correct. At the moment, we are not including version
numbers of the packages we export. It would be a good idea
to enter
a bugzilla issue to have this resolved.
I believe the reason we do not see a lot of traffic on the
mailing
lists about this issue is that if you import the EclipseLink
bundles
as bundles (rather than as packages) things should work.
That may
provide a workaround for you.
-Tom
Eric Gulatee wrote:
All,
I'm currently having trouble deploying the osgi bundles with
spring on the spring dm server platform.
It seems to be due to the osgi manifests not containing
version
information. It would seem spring has an optional import on
versions 1 through 2.
And since there isn't version info in the 1.1-M2
manifests, it's
failing to be imported. [What I've been told]
For anyone interested, here's the thread on
springsource's forums.
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=61456
Cheers,
Eric Gulatee.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users