Personally, I
prefer the wiki format to a document, as it is more community friendly, and
better integrated with the web, easier to review and
update.
<!--[if
!supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]-->
<!--[if
!supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]-->
-----Original
Message-----
From: Douglas
Clarke
Sent: Thursday,
December 17, 2009 12:17 PM
To: Eclipselink-Dev (E-mail);
Eclipselink-Users (E-mail)
Subject: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink
2.1 Documentation Proposal
<!--[if
!supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]-->
EclipseLink
Committers and Users,
Based on community
feedback we have decided that we should make some efforts to improve the
EclipseLink User Guide (ELUG) currently hosted on the Eclipse Wiki @ http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/UserGuide.
This initial ELUG was based on the contribution of the original Oracle
TopLink manual(s) converted directly into wiki content. While this was a
great way to get started it does have some usability issues and contains
older content that does not align with our current development
efforts.
Our goal is
address the requirements we have identified at http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/Documentation/Requirements.
Our proposed
solution is to author new user guides using an open XML based content format
with the content managed within the EclipseLink SVN repository. The format
will be DocBook XML files. We are looking for feedback on the approach as
well as recommendations, suggestions, best practice experience and of course
contributors.
The first guide we
propose creating is for EclipseLink JPA. We have started brain-storming a
table of contents here: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/Documentation/JPA
Please get
involved with this important process and provide your feedback on the eclispelink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list or on
the discussion pages for the provided requirement and JPA guide wiki
pages.
Cheers,
Doug