Re: [eclipse.org-project-leadership] Mailing lists {WAS: Automated Error

[Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

Yes, but can we have a shared white list with almost automatic white 
listing for any correspondent whose message has been successfully 
moderated on any list? I don't want to introduce typically an hour's 
delay for regular corespondents.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 05/06/2015 07:57, Werner Keil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As long as the list is not too attractive to spammers I'd also say 
> this is positive;-)
>
> Werner
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Alexandre Montplaisir
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 2:28 AM
> To: Mailing list for all people involved in Eclipse project management 
> ; dschaefer@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-project-leadership] Mailing lists {WAS: 
> Automated Error Reporting - Sign up for Weekly Problem Digests for 
> your Project]
>
>
>
> On 2015-06-04 09:03 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> > The cdt-dev mailing list has been around for a very long time, 14 
> > years I
> > think, and it¹s never been moderated. Never saw the need and unmoderated
> > lists promote openness.
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> I'd argue that allowing non-members to post to a list promotes even
> *more* openness.
>
> I have actually heard from colleagues that they once tried posting on
> our project's list (tracecompass-dev), but when they saw their message
> rejected saying they had to register, they just didn't bother further.
>
> Of course opening the list to non-members means more potential spam,
> which is why we (the project maintainers) would take care of the extra
> moderation workload. It's not so much that "I want to moderate my
> list!", but rather "I want non-members to be able to post, I offer that
> we handle the moderation then".
>
> Members' posts would still go in automatically. It's just non-member
> posts that would go to the moderation queue. Maybe that part was not 
> clear.
>
> > All discussions should happen in the open by default, not private.
>
> I completely agree here. I am not advocating for people to reply
> off-list, but rather to use the "Reply All" options, to reply to *both*
> the poster and the list. I find that the Reply-To header causes more
> problems than it solves, and a good part of our community agrees with
> this. Which is why I would like this option to be configurable
> per-list/project too. I could go into more details if you'd like.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-project-leadership mailing list
> eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal 
> to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, 
> you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-project-leadership mailing list
> eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal 
> to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, 
> you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5961 / Virus Database: 4355/9946 - Release Date: 06/05/15