Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Simultaneous Release Brainstorming

+1. I will have to miss tomorrow's call but I generally support the proposed change.


--
Sam Davis
Senior Software Engineer, Tasktop
Committer, Eclipse Mylyn
http://tasktop.com

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Frederic Gurr <frederic.gurr@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:
Hi,

+1 for cadence, schedule and name.

Can someone remind me what the purpose of the second checkpoint (C2) is?
Why is it not a milestone instead?

I'm a bit concerned about the "quiet week" becoming just "quiet 3 days".
It usually takes already 1-2 days to even fix a bug/discuss if a re-spin
should happen.
In this scenario re-spins will need to be an absolute exception - which
they should be anyways. So if the bug does not literally set the machine
on fire, user will need to wait for 13 weeks! ;)

Well, have we totally rulled out possibility for micro releases in case of need? IMHO this is the path forward.
 

Regards,

Fred


--
Frederic Gurr

Release Engineer
Eclipse Foundation

On 06.03.2018 17:22, Mélanie Bats wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 01/03/2018 à 17:59, Mélanie Bats a écrit :
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IVA59E5bxv1l1W1ZTSZMUUH7IKIO-mRLEGn1bVO-dFs/edit?usp=sharing
>> I need all of you to comment it, then when we will agree on the
>> content I will publish it on the wiki.
>>
>> You will see that in the FAQ I consider that we are decided about:
>> * the cadence : it will be 13 weeks
>> * the schedule : it will start on June 25th 2018
>> * the name : it will be Eclipse Year.Month
>>
>> Could you all votes for these three points by answering to this mail?
> At the moment, I had 4 +1 votes from Aleksandar, Nick, Dani and Martin.
>
> As it is an important decision I would like to see more votes. I expect
> a vote from mostly all of the members of the planning council. Please
> answer to this thread: do you agree with the proposed cadence, schedule,
> name and the FAQ?
>
> Thanks all for your participation!
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.


Back to the top