[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results
|
Eclipse MiRa is an existing product [1].
On the other hand, when I search for Eclipse Mars, most results are indeed
connected to the astronomic event. Hence I prefer Mars.
Dani
[1] http://www.connessioni.biz/website/categoria-prodotti/categoria-video/eclipse-mira-di-locatel.html?lang=en
From:
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
Eclipse Planning Council
private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
12.02.2014 00:39
Subject:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Luna+1 Poll Results
Sent by:
eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I think we should just pick amongst ourselves in the interest
of getting this done (given that we already had community input for the
initial vote). Also the community puts trust in us to handle these types
of decisions.
I feel like we should put forth Mira (highest voted of
the two) and Mars as a backup again. I actually like both names too.
Anyone have particular feelings about this?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Although if you search for Eclipse Mira,
you’ll see there are others.
From: Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014
at 6:34 PM
To: Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results
That's fine by me. I'm fine with either
Mira or Mars (with a slight preference to Mira as it might be more searchable).
Should we consider other names too?
Cheers,
Ian
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Doug Schaefer
<dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Or should we just pick amongst the council
and get this done.
From: Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 5:54 PM
To: Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results
Bummer.... I thought Mercury was a good
name too.
Mars and Mira were next on the list.
Should we start with a run-off election with those two, or should we start
the entire poll over again? Chris, what are your thoughts?
Cheers,
Ian
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Janet
Campbell <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Unfortunately, we will not
be able to proceed with Mercury. We’ll need to re-start the
process to select a new name.
Regards,
Janet
---------------------
Janet Campbell
Director, Intellectual Property
Secretary and Legal Counsel
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
From: Mike Milinkovich [mailto:mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: February-04-14 1:37 PM
To: Chris Aniszczyk; Eclipse Planning Council private list; Janet Campbell
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results
On 04/02/2014 1:21 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
Any updates on this Mike as the Planning
Council meets tomorrow!
The only update I can give at the moment is that Magellan is a definite
no, and Mercury is probably a yes. We're waiting on one last check
before we give the green light. Sorry we're not finalized, but it's not
in our hands at the moment.
I suggest that the best the Planning Council can do at the moment is agree
that as soon as the trademark review is passed by the EMO, that the approval
for "Eclipse Mercury" is done.
--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1
250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com
| http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1
250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com
| http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.
--
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719 _______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.