The only reason that comes into my mind is the hence
Eclipse 4 contains a lot of modelling content, it was
created by "modelling people". Not all modelling people
where involved but Eclipse 4 committers needed to know
what EMF is and all these. (most of them at least)
There is a chance that these people will be at the
modelling symposium. Wouldnt that mean that we run the
Eclipse 5 talk without the people that created Eclipse 4 ?
(I have people like Tom Schindl and Eric Moffat in my
mind)....
Is that just me ?
christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Martin Lippert
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2012 17:44
An: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Betreff: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee]
feedback regarding Eclipse 5 talk
Hey!
just for me to understand that.
Why would that be at the end of the day.
This year we will only have BoFs
at the end of the first day. So
putting the Eclipse 5 talk on the
first day is fine. Putting it "on
the end" would mean that it
overlaps with the Modelling Symposium
which is also at the end of the
first day.
That in my opinion would be
unfortunate (unless we want Eclipse 5 to
contain no modelling at all :-) ).
I guess what you meant is "Eclipse
5" should be somewhere say in the
afternoon of the first day.
(Morning is tutorial anyway)
John suggested to put the talk at the end of a day in
order to have some more time after the talk for possible
discussions (kind of a similar reason why we put the
modeling symposium there)... ;-)
I understand your opinion about not having in parallel
with the modeling symposium, but doesn't that mean we
shouldn't put the Eclipse 5 talk in parallel with any
talk? (I guess it will be a hard competition anyway, why
is the modeling symposium special there?)
-Martin
Right ?
christian
Am 14.08.12 17:21 schrieb "Martin
Lippert" unter <lippert@xxxxxxx>:
Hey!
I got an answer from John
regarding the Eclipse 5 talk and he is
happy with keeping this as a
standard talk with a subsequent BoF
session. So scheduling this talk
at the end of the day would make much sense.
Cheers,
-Martin
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progr
am-co
mmittee
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: http://www.compeople.de/
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender:
Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft:
Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB
56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progra
m-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web:
http://www.compeople.de/
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
