Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] PMC or parent TLP-less projects

[Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mickael, 

Perhaps until we can change process you can join PMC to +1 these changes? 

Alternatively we could restructure m2e into the tools PMC. The m2e project does seem to align well with the Tools charter. 

I hope my suggestions on short term fixes don't distract too much from the long term issues you are raising here. 

HTH, 

Jonah 

On Thu., Jun. 2, 2022, 08:08 Mickael Istria, <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:39 PM Ed Merks <ed.merks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

With CQs going away, isn't the only thing each PMC needs to do is give a +1 once a year for a review?

For the case of m2e, PMC action is required for 2 ongoing actions: import of code from an external GitHub repo and restructure review to get m2e-wtp into m2e, not as a separate project. For the later, I think it's fair that PMC or EMO has a say; but for the former, I just see it as already 3 days wasted waiting for someone to give a +1 while the person who can give this +1 without really adding extra value to the process.

 

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council