From this page: http://central.sonatype.org/pages/producers.html,
it sounds like Eclipse could get a free license from Sonatype for
the integration. That page also notes that other 'forges' like
Apache, JBoss, and Oracle are already connected.
I don't know how Eclipse's repos are viewed. For the LocationTech
working group, users have to go to extra work to include/use the
LocationTech Nexus. From my point of view, publishing project
artifacts to Maven central is much more desirable since it eases
adoption.
To some degree, I'd have to the reverse opinion: Why is Eclipse
going to the trouble of maintaining servers that our projects' users
have to opt into working with?
On 11/10/2017 04:55 AM, Mickael Istria
wrote:
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
|