[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] PMC Approval Lag?
|
> The Tools versus Technology split still makes sense IMHO. Technology fills
> the need to have a default place to hold incubators while they mature.
This is our 'Eclipse Incubator' :)
> a) The PMC does need to be more active and responsive. It should also
> likely be fully representative of the projects it includes.
+1
> b) There are a number of projects which appear to be staying in
> Technology longer than they should. Once a project is mature, it should
> typically be looking for a new home. (Yes, there are always exceptions, but
> that should be the general rule.) So I think the Technology PMC should be
> encouraging mature projects to evaluate whether they should move.
+1
> No, I don’t think that the AC have the authority to refactor the projects.
> That requires the PMCs.
As the AC, we can merely suggest... :)
So - two items for the next AC meeting, perhaps:
1) That the Tools PMC look to expansion and staffing from more of its
contained projects;
2) That the Technology PMC take steps to help mature Technology
contained projects to move out from under the Technology umbrella.
cheers
--oh
--oh