Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] RE: Nominating Kim Moir

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

Already +1'ed Kim. Just want to +1 the process change too. It's always important to allow frank discussion and that's best done in a meeting where we can chose what to record. :).

:D

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Mik Kersten <mik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Agreed.  I think it would work well to have a process suggestion of raising nominations on a call before putting forward the email vote.

Mik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Chris Aniszczyk

...
> > Perhaps we should restrict nominations to occur only during the phone
> call?
>
> I'm not against this and I think this would actually be a good idea.

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.