Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:36:15 -0500
Delivered-to: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipse.org-architecture-council>
List-help: <mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council>, <mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council>, <mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

* David Carver <d_a_carver@xxxxxxxxx> [2010-02-12 13:34]:
> 2.  Outstanding bug request.   This is still in the hands of the
> Eclipse network admins.   They have concerns about hudson doing the
> tagging.   However this is a standard process that many
> organizations follow.

I've been thinking about this a bit.  If we used SVN (revisions) or git,
this wouldn't be an issue, right?

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks
  - From: David Carver

References:
- [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks
  - From: David Carver

Prev by Date: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks
Next by Date: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks
Previous by thread: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks
Next by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] My Past Due Tasks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs