[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders
|
Good to have some discussion!
One point about alternating is that it's not only about
remembering when
the next call is. It's also about scheduling other calls,
and seems to
create some ripple
effect:
If it's important for me to regularly join alternating AC
meetings, then I
cannot organize standing meetings on either Tuesday or
Thursday.
Unless I'm OK with not joining a standing meeting
every 2 months.
But we have the voting system for finding the best
possible
compromise. If you can't ever attend a meeting on
Tuesday,
you can vote it -1. That is, you have a +1/-1 vote for each
of
the alternatives, giving 3 votes in total which you
can exercise
or not.
Assuming Neil's -1 for Tuesday and Oliver's -1 for
Thursday
(who said they definitely can't join these days),
we currently get:
+2 Thursday (Andrew, Jeff, Martin -
Oliver)
+3 Alternating (Jeff, Neil, Boris)
+3 Tuesday (Jeff, Oliver, Chris, Martin -
Neil)
I'm not in favor of re-voting (in the interest of getting a
decision
soon), but feel
free to change a vote or add one which
you
have not exercised yet.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project
Lead, DSDP PMC Member
+1 for alternating. With all the Google calendars we have in place now for
Eclipse related events, it should be possible to use a more complicated call
schedule.
Boris
Neil Hauge wrote:
> +1 for
Alternating.
>
> If we don't alternate, then some will be forever
unable to attend on a
> set day. I would not be able to attend
Tuesday at 11am due to a
> standing PMC meeting. Alternating
seems to be the most inclusive option.
>
> I think if alternating
is not the winner, we should have a re-vote for
> Tuesday or Thursday
to get a clear count. : ) In any case, my secondary
> vote would
be +1 for Keep Thursday.
