Re: [eclipse-pmc] Please approve works-with dependency on XULRunner 17

[Daniel Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Dani


From:      
 John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:      
 22.07.2013 17:44
Subject:    
   [eclipse-pmc]
Please approve works-with dependency on XULRunner 17
Sent by:    
   eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

PMC members, 

The SWT team has submitted a CQ to document a dependency on XUL Runner
17. This is not a library we would distribute with Eclipse Platform or
SWT. If the library is present, then SWT can optionally use the library
in its Browser widget. As required by the Eclipse 3rd party library policy
[2], the PMC must determine what kind of dependency this is, and record
its decision in a public communication channel. I propose we record this
as a "works-with" dependency. This exact case is in fact used
as an example in the definition of "Works with" in the policy
document. Please cast your vote here. 

+1 from me 


[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7434
[2] http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc