Re: [eclipse-pmc] Please approve works-with dependency on XULRunner 17

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Not that I can find. We do have a similar
one for WebKit:

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4469

John





From:      
 Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,

Date:      
 07/22/2013 03:37 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [eclipse-pmc]
Please approve works-with dependency on XULRunner      
 17
Sent by:    
   eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

+1 from me.  I thought we already had XUL Runner
as a works with dependency.


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:44 AM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
PMC members, 

The SWT team has submitted a CQ to document a dependency on XUL Runner
17. This is not a library we would distribute with Eclipse Platform or
SWT. If the library is present, then SWT can optionally use the library
in its Browser widget. As required by the Eclipse 3rd party library policy
[2], the PMC must determine what kind of dependency this is, and record
its decision in a public communication channel. I propose we record this
as a "works-with" dependency. This exact case is in fact used
as an example in the definition of "Works with" in the policy
document. Please cast your vote here. 

+1 from me 


[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7434
[2] http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc

_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc