Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse-pmc] One Eclipse project is still using CVS

I've fixed the eclipsebuilder metadata. It move a while back.

And, yes, my year ends on M4. :)

Speaking of metadata, is this "wall of shame" URL supposed to show something for "eclipse"? Anything? Is this a sign something else is wrong with metadata? Or, just a PHP or tool quirk?

http://eclipse.org/projects/tools/status.php?git=0&cvs=1&top=eclipse

Thanks for the reminders,




From:        Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        11/27/2012 02:28 PM
Subject:        Re: [eclipse-pmc] One Eclipse project is still using CVS
Sent by:        eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




There are two CVS repositories listed in the project metadata.

/cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder
/cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.releng.eclipsebuilder

Is eclipsebuilder included in your plan?

Does your year end on December 21/2012? :-)

Wayne

On 11/27/2012 02:22 PM, David M Williams wrote:

I think we are all done, except for one cvs project, org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder, and that is one we don't want to blindly put in git (because it is mostly a whole lot of binary copies of sdk bundles -- 4 Gigabyte's worth) but instead move two or three small projects into git and then build with SDK. Tracked in bug 324682.

Its on my list of things-to-do this year, so, yes, almost ready.

That's all I am aware of.

[1]
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324682





From:         Wayne Beaton
<wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        
"eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:         11/27/2012 01:16 PM
Subject:         [eclipse-pmc] One Eclipse project is still using CVS
Sent by:        
eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Greetings Eclipse PMC.

The eclipse.platform.releng project is still using CVS. The project metadata indicates that there are two CVS repositories still in use.

http://eclipse.org/projects/project.php?id=eclipse.platform.releng

Is this just inaccurate metadata, or does this repository need to be moved to Git?

Further, there seems to be ~450 directories under /cvsroot/eclipse that are potentially active (i.e. they still seem writeable to me).

Is the Eclipse project ready for the CVS shutdown?

Wayne

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore
Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon
          2013_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list

eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc



_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc


--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore
Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon
          2013_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc

Attachment: STG53452
Description: Binary data

Attachment: STG30268
Description: Binary data


Back to the top