[eclipse-dev] Gerrit only vs. Gerrit + bugzilla?

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I probably should know this already and
maybe just forgot, but I am wondering if we ever settled on a project-wide
policy about if bugs should always be open for Gerrit patches, or if a
Gerrit patch is enough? 

My guess is if we do have a policay,
it'd be something like "if there is anything conceptual involved,
a bugzilla should be open, for documentation, discussion and good visibility,
but if it's a mere spelling correction, or similar, then a Gerrit-only
patch is sufficient". 

But ... I'd be the last to know, so
thought I'd ask here publically ... and if it needs lots of discussion,
guess I could open a bug :) 

If we do have such a policy, is it documented
somewhere? Or is it up to each component team to decide? 

I'm asking because I got a few Gerrit
patches recently, such as https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/31476/
 which I think deserve a bugzilla entry, but wanted to make sure I
wasn't just "old school" and "stuck in my ways". 

Thanks,