Re: [eclipse-dev] architecture meeting notes, May 14, 2008

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes this is fine and seems to be the
right precedent. 

I appreciate everyone's efforts to discuss
this and be sensitive to what's best for downstream adopters. 

Also, I apologize for my earlier grumpy
notes  ... 
I promise to get more sleep from now
on  :)   so I can remain constructive. 

Very Much thanks,

From:	Philippe P Mulet/France/IBM@IBMFR
To:	"General development mailing list of the Eclipse project." <eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM
Date:	05/14/2008 12:14 PM
Subject:	Re: [eclipse-dev] architecture meeting notes, May 14, 2008

---

Re: bundle versions.
For 3.4, the PMC will veto any plugin version downgrading from 3.4M6 (API
freeze). Plugin version upgrading (to reflect reality) is acceptable if
properly motivated to the PMC.

David - on behalf of WTP - do you validate
this strategy ?

Boris Bokowski <Boris_Bokowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/14/2008 06:07 PM

Please respond to
"General development mailing list of the Eclipse project."        <eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[eclipse-dev] architecture meeting notes, May 14, 2008

- We decided to revert bundle version numbers to their
state in M7, unless we detected that version numbers were not updated correctly
with respect to 3.3.
- PMC approval is required for all changes to bundle version numbers (except
qualifiers).
- Platform Team would like to disable functionality related to proxies
to fix a crash issue and would like to know if anyone relies on this: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=231352_______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev