Hi Folks,
An update: After lots of fussing, it seems that the R-HEAD build
began failing on scp because Markus' shell account was accidently
disabled [1].
Now that that's fixed, we are back to the R-HEAD build failing
because of the original problem...i.e. an SHA-256 digest error
like this:
Waiting for jobs to end
org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException:
java.lang.SecurityException: SHA-256 digest error for
org/apache/http/client/cache/HttpCacheEntry.class
at
org.eclipse.buckminster.runtime.BuckminsterException.fromMessage(BuckminsterException.java:57)
at
org.eclipse.buckminster.runtime.BuckminsterException.wrap(BuckminsterException.java:123)
at
org.eclipse.buckminster.core.actor.AbstractActor.perform(AbstractActor.java:205)
at
org.eclipse.buckminster.core.internal.actor.PerformManager$DirectActionInvocation.execute(PerformManager.java:143)
at
org.eclipse.buckminster.core.internal.actor.PerformManager.internalPerform(PerformManager.java:454)
at
org.eclipse.buckminster.core.internal.actor.PerformManager.perform(PerformMan
It's our hypothesis that this is a problem with the pack200 that
we are using (from Java *6* currently in the builder). It's my
hope that updating to either Java 7 or Java 8 will make this error
go away, so we've asked the folks at OSU Open Source Lab to update
the Java version on Jenkins to be Java 7 or Java 8 (it might need
to be Java 7 based upon the OS that they are using there).
In any event, it's my hope that this will solve the pack200 error
that we are getting above. It's possible that it will not, but
I'd rather not think about that now. :).
Unfortunately, Neon M5 occurs on Feb 5 (3 days from now). Since
we can't contribute a build today (still Tuesday in US), it seems
that we won't be able to contribute a new build for Neon M5.
I don't want to do this, but if this issue can't be resolved we
will likely have to withdraw from the Neon simultaneous release.
That's because packed repos are required for the Simultaneous
Release.
Thanks,
Scott
[1]
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=486424
On 1/24/2016 1:27 PM, Wim Jongman wrote: