Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [e4-dev] E4 Formal API Part 3: App Context

Hi,
why does it feel wrong? As long as it is stateless it seems OK for me.
Best Regards
Jonas


Am 08.03.2013 07:31, schrieb Lars Vogel:
Should we not also create a service for ContextInjectionFactory? Feels wrong to use a Factory to perform the dependency injection. 

2013/3/7 Eric Moffatt <emoffatt@xxxxxxxxxx>

OK, here's the third part http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse4/API/AppContext, giving Services and other elements (@Named things) that are guaranteed to be available from the application's (window's?) context. My comments are already on the wiki. Again everybody feel free to comment...

I'll let the wiki soak for a bit to give everyone a chance to have their say and then refine the pages based on the feedback.

Everyone should look for missing things such as the Life Cycle annotations.

Over the next few days we expect to be taking the initial code actions necessary (i.e. changing packages to API and adding @NoReference etc to stuff we don't want to formalize (yet)).

On the model side we expect to *remove* the more funky of the menu / tb items as well as adding in an MCompositePart (an MPart that is also an MPartSashContainer (to support split parts...).

Now that I understand what @Active does and that the ESelectionService actually contains more functionality than is available through DI (i.e. 'post' selection listeners) the only remaining question that I'm aware of is which of ContextFunction / IContextFunction we should go with...

Also I've added the IEventBroker to the list of services since even though most listeners should be able to use the @Topic annotation there's no way to *unregister* transient listeners using DI...

If we can get it done I'd really like to have this (at least mostly) available in M6. Then I'd ask folks that have tutorials / examples etc to check whether they still have any references to non-API in them and figure out if it's something we missed or whether we should update the code to use the proper API...

Thanks a lot for the feedback so far, keep it up !
Eric

_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev




_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev


Back to the top