[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [dsdp-pmc] [CQ 2766] NAB demo player
|
Hi Shigkei,
The PMC already approved the MWT libraries as "non-exempt pre-req". We
don't need to vote again.
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dsdp-pmc/msg01575.html
You just need to create a new CQ for libraries and reference this vote.
Then in the comments on CQ 2766, put a link to the MWT library CQ that
you create.
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shigeki Moride
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Gaff, Doug; DSDP PMC list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] [CQ 2766] NAB demo player
Doug, PMC,
I'm little bit confusing about IP procedure. But, let me go as step by
step.
So,
We got vote for NAB demo-player.
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dsdp-pmc/msg01575.html
Now, please approve MWT libraries as "non-exempt pre-req".
MWT is a "run-time" multi-platform GUI library that is distributed from
WideStudio.org.
http://www.widestudio.org
MWT is licensed under X11/MIT license.
The application build by NAB is require MWT libraries.
Please vote this.
Shigeki
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:51:26 -0700
"Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shigeki,
>
> I just reread this ipzilla thread. Let me explain what Sharon is
asking
> for.
>
> 1) In Comment #29, the PMC voted to allow a "non-exempt pre-req" for
NAB
> demo player to the MWT libraries:
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dsdp-pmc/msg01575.html
>
> 2) This requires that you enter a second CQ for the MWT libraries.
(The
> second CQ isn't for Wide Studio. Sharon appears to be confused.
Instead
> it's specifically for the libraries the player depends on.) Even
though
> the libraries are not distributed with the demo player via Eclipse,
the
> IP process requires that non-exempt pre-requisite dependencies be
> approved by the IP team.
>
> Can you follow up on this and create the separate CQ for review?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 3:14 PM
> To: dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [dsdp-pmc] [CQ 2766] NAB demo player
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2766
>
>
> Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Severity|under_review |awaiting_pmc
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #36 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 2009-04-21 15:13:25 ---
> Following up on CQ:
>
> As per the Eclipse Dependency Policy
>
(http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3
> rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf)
> please see the following section:
>
> b. If a pre-req is non-exempt, it must go through the IP review
process
> and be
> approved or
> non-approved for use as a pre-req.
>
> During the review of this content, and subsequent conversations, it
was
> determined that a CQ would need to entered for WideStudio. I do not
> believe a
> CQ has been entered to date.
>
> As a result, I am placing this CQ into "awaiting pmc" in order to
follow
> up on
> the Widestudio CQ.
>
> Thanks,
> Sharon
>
> Auto-Generated Text: IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.
>
>
> --
> Configure CQmail:
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the CQ.
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
>
--
Shigeki Moride
moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
moride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx