[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: MTJ Release Review
|
Hi Christian,
I definitely think you're ready to complete your MTJ
Reboot with this 0.9 release!
+1 from Martin Oberhuber for the Review.
I did notice a couple of things though:
* Title slide references dev.process v2.3.1 of Jan 17,2007
but current is Rev 2.4 of August 20, 2008 -- are you
allowed to release by the old process ?
* Slide 5 - why "MTJ Reboot _proposed_ plan"? I think you did
all that already?
* On your projectplan,
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=dsdp.mtj
I'm surprised that most bug references are BOTH proposed AND committed
I believe they should only be one of (proposed, committed)?
* Slide 6 - features - are the "improvements" compared to MTJ 0.7
or compared to EclipseME ? You did base 0.9 on the EclipseME
code, no?
* Slide 8 - "JAD Attributed" should be "JAD Attributes" ?
* Slide 11 - End-of-life
Shouldn't that talk about EOL'ing all the MTJ 0.7 APIs?
And adding EclipseME / MTJ 0.9 APIs instead?
* Slide 15 - Schedule
"and the following weeks" should be "in the following weeks" ?
* Slide 16 - Communities
4000 downloads of *each* N-build? Or in total? This is a very
high number. The #downloads for one specific milestone would
likely be more representative.
* Slide 16 - Press release - is there a link to it?
* Slide 17 - yellow color hard to read
* IP Log:
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/ipLog.php
Are "Gang Ma" and "Gang(Allen) Ma" the same person?
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christian Kurzke
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:06 AM
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: MTJ Release Review
>
> Hi Mark, (and others)
>
>
> the team posted a preliminary version of the slides here:
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/reviews/MTJ_0.9_Release_Review
_v0.2.pdf
> we will need to fine tune and add the blanks until the review
> meeting,
> but - this is in a overview the scope of the presentation.
>
> Please give the formal vote, so we can officially schedule
> the meeting.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Christian
>
>
>
> Mark Rogalski wrote:
> >
> > Do you have some preliminary release review slides you can
> distribute
> > to us?
> >
> > <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
>