Hi all,
EclipseCon 2007 submissions are open, as you have all seen from
various announcements by now. The submissions
page has all of the useful info. Here is the schedule:
- November 1st
- Tutorial proposals must be in.
- November 15th
- Tutorials chosen.
- December 1st
- Long Talks and Panel proposals must be in.
- December 30th
- Long Talks and Panels chosen.
- January 15th
- Short Talks and Demos proposals must be in.
- January 30th
- Short Talks and Demos chosen.
As is the case every year, the tutorial submission deadline
comes up quickly. Based on our conversations in August, here is a
potential breakdown of talks in the mobile/embedded track:
|
|
Long
|
Short
|
Panel / Demo
|
Demo
|
Long Tutorial
|
Short Tutorial
|
Notes
|
|
DD
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long talk to update on DSF, SPIRIT, Multi-core
|
|
TM
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
Tutorial TM 1.0.
|
|
MTJ
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
Tutorial MTJ 0.x.
|
|
NAB
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long talk on NAB with demo
|
|
eRCP
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
Tutorial eRCP 1.0.
|
|
TML
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Short or long talk on TmL
|
|
external
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
5
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
|
|
Alloc
|
5
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
|
Chris A has already submitted a short tutorial for eRCP, and Gorkem
has submitted a short talk. (Thanks guys!)
So Mika and Martin, please get your submission ASAP.
It’s unlikely tutorials will come from external sources here, and CDT for
embedded will be covered under the C/C++ track. So it’s up to us to
fill them.
All projects: please provide feedback on the remaining
allocations. Any opinions on the panel?
Thanks, Doug
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:02 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Eclipse Con 2007
Hi Doug,
the new schedule for short talks is a very good idea.
I'm sure that will help people a lot who are trying to
cover those short talks that are relevant for them.
I agree that the long talk for TM is not necessary
when we've got a short talk and a short tutorial.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:49 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Eclipse Con 2007
Yes, two 4-hr tutorials became three 2-hr tutorials.
I know (8 != 6), but I think Bjorn is leaving some spacing.
I generally agree with your suggestions, but with only 5 long
talks available, it’s going to be hard to accommodate a long talk for
every project. I wish we had more, given that DSDP is a lot like
Tools…each project is independent. But you know how it goes.
There’s always more content than available time.
“External” in the table below does refer to what comes in through
EclipseZilla that’s not directly from one of the DSDP projects. I
didn’t make my table add up, though, so perhaps that was confusing.
Short talks are going to be organized differently this
year. Instead of having a bunch in parallel, a set of 5 or 6 short talks
will overlap with long talks, so there will only be 1 short talk sessions going
on at any given time. This will reduce people attempting to switch
rooms. I’m certain we could group all of the mobile and embedded
short talks together, too.
Anyway, these were only suggestions based on everyone’s
feedback so far. Flexibility is good, and we should wait and see what
comes in through EZilla. However, if the schedule is like last year, we
won’t have a lot of time to figure this out, which is what I’m
working on it now. Here’s last year’s schedule:
Oct 15 – Keynotes
Nov 1 – Tutorial deadline
Dec 1 – Long talk deadline (extended from Nov 15)
Two rounds of short talk selections that finished in Dec and
Feb.
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:32 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Eclipse Con 2007
Hi Doug,
just to be clear -- from the original allocation
|
Long
|
Short
|
Panel/Demo
|
Tutorial
|
|
Mobile
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
DSDP
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
the two 4-hour tutorials were now converted into 3 2-hour
tutorials,
right? So based on the current plan, we'll have 3 more long talks,
and 2 more demo/panels to fill, right?
Anyways, I do not think we should fill all our slots already now,
and leave some room to see what comes in through EclipseZilla.
I guess that's what you meant by "external".
- TmL might become mature enough for a long talk by EclipseCon
next year.
- For TM, I could also imagine doing a Long Talk in addition to
the VLT/2-hour tutorial.
- Did MTJ have a long talk last year? If not, doing both a Long
Talk and a VLT might be appropriate.
- Same for eRCP.
My point is tha the Short Talks are really _so_ short that you
can't really explain a
technology. Also, people are not so free to choose from the short
talks since they
cannot change rooms while they are ongoing.
OK, so currently we have 3 long talks, 2 short talks and 2
demo/panels open.
It might be better to leave 2 long / 3 short / 2 demos open.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:59 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Eclipse Con 2007
Hi folks,
Based on our discussion today, here is my best guess at
allocations. This leaves room for some external user-related talks.
I know it’s early to think about EclipseCon, but I want to have our ducks
in a row when the submission period opens up. Comments?
VLT = Very Long Talk = 2 hour tutorial on Monday
Doug
|
Long
|
Short
|
Panel/Demo
|
VLT
|
Notes
|
|
DD
|
1
|
|
|
|
Long talk to update on DSF, SPIRIT, Multi-core
|
|
TM
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
Tutorial TM 1.0.
|
|
MTJ
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
Tutorial MTJ 0.x.
|
|
NAB
|
1
|
|
|
|
Long talk on NAB with demo
|
|
eRCP
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
Tutorial eRCP 1.0.
|
|
TML
|
?
|
1
|
|
|
Short or long talk on TmL
|
|
external
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
2
|
6
|
0
|
3
|
|
|
Alloc
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
3
|
|
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:09 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Cc: gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Eclipse Con 2007
Hi all,
I realized that I forgot to give you the current allocation in
my last email. This was communicated at the council meetings in
Chicago. I suspect there is some flexibility and trading that can go on
based on the needs of others. Rich and I are discussing what the
distinction is supposed to be between DSDP and Mobile, but both tracks are
clearly related to our projects.
|
Long
|
Short
|
Panel/Demo
|
Tutorial
|
|
Mobile
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
DSDP
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Anyway, we have 6 independent and distinct projects to cover, so
we’ll have to collectively figure out what the layout of material should
be. We also need to accommodate user tracks in this total count, as Mark
suggests below with his ideas for eRCP.
Doug
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Mark Rogalski
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:54 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Cc: gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] Eclipse Con 2007
Yes, I think
IBM will have someone attend for eRCP. However, I'm thinking that we might want
to show more on how eRCP is being used in products rather than just describe
the project again. That would be a long talk.
I think a 4
hour tutorial is too long for eRCP. If there were 2 hour slots I think we would
be interested. Gorkem, what do you think?
A short talk
might be good just to go over the latest happenings with the project.
Hi PMC,
I would like to
get a quick survey of your intended participation in EclipseCon next year so I
can make sure there are allocated slots.
Can each of you
respond to the following?
- Would you
like to do a tutorial for your project?
- Would you
like to do one or more long talks for your project? How many?
- Would you
like to do a short talk for your project?
Please respond
ASAP.
Thanks, Doug
_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
|
