[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo
|
I agree with Craig, N-1 support is "very nice to have" feature, and we
should keep Ganymede builds for now.
Please note, this is relevant for the "non-Pulsar" plug-ins, not the
quick-install view etc. I'm fine if the Pulsar specific code has
dependencies on Galileo.
-Christian
Craig Setera wrote:
I have a concern with removing support unless it is necessary. This
assumes that users will either:
1) Be able to immediately jump to 3.5 (not have plugins that depend on
3.4)
2) Maintain two Eclipse installations
Our internal tools are an example of #1. We are currently broken on
3.5. While I hope to resolve that issue, until then I'm either stuck
with two installations of Eclipse or I can't use MTJ. I think this is
a very common occurrence for users early in the new version release
cycle. I'd really like to see us maintain N-1 support if at all
possible. Throwing out support for anything prior to 3.4 seems like a
no brainer, but 3.4 and 3.5 support would be nice.
What would it take to run a regular build against Ganymede to validate
it is still building?
Craig
On 5/11/09 10:45 AM, Hildum Eric-XFQ473 wrote:
As Galileo has always been the target for MTJ, I have no problem with
dropping the Ganymede support at this point.
Eric Hildum
Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK
Developer Platforms and Services
Ecosystem and Market Development
Motorola
Direct: +1-408-541-6809
809 11th Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Paula
Gustavo-WGP010
*Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2009 7:05
*To:* Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
*Subject:* [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo
Hi MTJ,
In some o four past meeting we talked about the possibility of
keeping MTJ support both on ganymede and galileo. With the addition
of all Pulsar tasks, it end up that current MTJ is only building
against Galileo. MTJ runtime feature still installs/run on Ganymede,
but there is no guarantee that it will continue installing since we
are not building against Ganymede anymore.
I will like to hear some thoughts about that. Is it ok for everyone
to keep only Galileo support or Ganymede is mandatory for MTJ??? A
single target platform makes our life much easier in the build
environment. Since I maintain the build environment I would vote for
Galileo-only J… but I don’t want to take that decision alone
J
Gep (back from vacation)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev