Hi craig,
This initial proposal
only lists the packages, some classes and the extension points. We still need
to go into the detail of each class.
We didn’t include yet the
discussion that we had in the past week about device / sdk register.
J
gep
De:
dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome de Craig Setera
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de
janeiro de 2009 17:06
Para: Mobile
Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Assunto: Re: RES: [dsdp-mtj-dev]
MTJ API Proposal
I will try to find time tonight to look at your proposal and then offer
my opinions. Does the proposal address the issues I brought up a week or
so ago on the list?
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
I’m also concerned with
that.
As far as I understand,
our requirement is to have an API freeze on M6 and, if we want to be a 1.0, we
need to have a “closed” api. But we don’t need to be 1.0 to be on the train. We
are proposing that because it seems to be a good timing for MTJ (but we can
re-discuss that)
On the API review, what
we can do if to focus on some parts that are more important and leave the rest
of the API as internal (that’s what eclipse suggests). This would reduce the
effort to review and have all inputs. On the future we can start to discuss
about moving some of the internal apis to be public.
On the proposal we
already tried to do something like that
Do you think this make
sense?
For clarification, what are the API
requirements for Galileo release? I'm very concerned with trying to
complete API's in such a short period. I'm also concerned about declaring
the API's "complete" without enough time to get lots of input.
Do we need to be at "1.0" for the release train? If so,
how is 1.0 defined and can we declare some of the questionable API's as
provisional until we can get more input?
On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Paula
Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
Hi MTJ,
We did an initial analysis of current MTJ API and presented a proposal of
the possible changes that we can do. This proposal is documented on our wiki http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/Refactoring. This is just a proposal, so feel free to
suggest other possible changes.
MTJ API freeze is on M6 (Mar/16/2009), so any
change that we want to do need to be done until that date. Since there is not a lot of time, I would like to propose a target date of Feb/13 to close this
review process. This would give us time to implement the changes after we decide which one should be
there.
We can have this discussion here on the list.
Regards,
J
gep
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
|