Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ API Proposal

[Craig Setera <craigjunk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

For clarification, what are the API requirements for Galileo release?  I'm very concerned with trying to complete API's in such a short period.  I'm also concerned about declaring the API's "complete" without enough time to get lots of input.  Do we need to be at "1.0" for the release train?  If so, how is 1.0 defined and can we declare some of the questionable API's as provisional until we can get more input?

On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:

Hi MTJ,

We did an initial analysis of current MTJ API and presented a proposal of the possible changes that we can do. This proposal is documented on our wiki http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/Refactoring. This is just a proposal, so feel free to suggest other possible changes.

MTJ API freeze is on M6 (Mar/16/2009), so any change that we want to do need to be done until that date. Since there is not a lot of time, I would like to propose a target date of Feb/13 to close this review process. This would give us time to implement the changes after we decide which one should be there.

We can have this discussion here on the list.

Regards,

J

gep

_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev