I see, well, in order to get a quick
approval I think we should change the CQ to consider ASM 3, allowing us to
commit it into SVN sooner. Then we can verify if EclipseME refactored code
works with ASM 3. If it does not work, we can either adapt the code to ASM 3 or
try to have ASM 2.2.2 approved.
What do you guys think about that approach?
Hugo
From:
dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008
6:09 PM
To: Mobile
Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev]
EclipseME Empty API Generator
I have not tried any other versions. It is likely that 2.2.1
could work... although it may be missing a necessary bug fix (I was working
with the ASM guys while I worked on this to get necessary bug fixes into ASM).
I've not tried ASM 3, nor do I have a feeling for whether it would work
in place of ASM 2.2.2.
On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Raniere Hugo-wha006 wrote:
Thanks for the information. I’ve
already attached to the CQ the source code necessary.
I’ve got another question to you
concerning the ASM dependency.
We filed a CQ for ASM version 2.2.2
There are other versions of ASM already
approved to use by eclipse.
Do you know if EclipseME works with a different version? If yes, which one (1.5.3, 2.2.1, 3.0 or 3.1)? Thanks, Hugo
The website generator isn't of interest...
It is primarily used to add the necessary code to the EclipseME web site to add
Google Ads. (which I just realized I'm going to lose when transitioning
to MTJ... hmm).
In terms of the manual folder, I had
actually forgotten about that being there. In certain cases, the tool was
having trouble doing an automatic translation. The manual folder contains
empty API classes that I had to build out to some extent by hand. It is
an integral part of the empty API generation. In terms of
copyright/license, they should all have my standard copyright and be EPL
licensed.... not that there is really anything that useful in there.
These will need to be added to the CQ.
On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Raniere
Hugo-wha006 wrote:
Basically I’ve found 2 tools there:
- EmptyAPIGenerator: I’ll
attach its source code to the existing EclipseME CQ. I’ve a question
about the contents existent in the eclipse-me-tools/manual folder.
Are they used by the EmptyAPIGenerator?
- Website Generator: Right now I
don’t think it is necessary to submit this code, as we don’t
have a clear definition of how the documentation will be presented on MTJ
site. If necessary, we can submit this code in the future. What is your
opnion about that?
Is there any other code that you think
that should be submitted?
Looking forward to hearing from you,
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
|