I understand the pain this causes. Hopefully an ANTLR 3 port is
relatively painless.
One subtle point that you might not be aware of: although you
can’t rely on ANTLR 2.x, the EclipseME code that was using it can still be
checked into Eclipse CVS. Then whoever is doing the ANTLR 3 migration can use
the existing code as a starting point.
From: Craig Setera
[mailto:craigjunk@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:09 PM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; Mobile Tools for The Java Platform
mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Issue with preprocessing support with
antenna
Mike,
Our emails must have crossed in the ether... This is
unfortunate, as it immediately puts MTJ one step behind EclipseME. While
I understand the reasons, it makes it difficult for me to easily transition
myself and EclipseME users over to MTJ.
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
Trust me. It’s a substantial issue. J If
you want details, feel free to call me (613-220-3223).
Sorry, but that is not going to work.
I think we should go back to
Eclipse legal and request approval for the older version of ANTLR. I
can't imagine why there would be a substantial issue.
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
|