> This is pretty much what I had in
mind. But I also think there is room for commonality between CDI and
DSF,
>
such as selecting the executable to launch, though these
common tabs would need to be separated from the CDI launch
tabs.
I actually thought about having an empty
base launch because I figured you would want to allow any debugger to re-use
these
launch configuration type
:-)
>
Looking further with this, we could also define more
sophisticated remote launch UI which would use RSE to find and configure the
target to launch on.
> The benefit of such launches would be a
standardized UI that both open-source and commercial solutions could build
on.
This
sounds very exciting.
I
assume that it is to late for Ganymede to start this type of
change?
Marc
Marc Khouzam wrote:
Currently you can only add/insert tabs to the existing tab group. You
cannot remove/replace tabs.
Can we have a base launch with no tabs?
Then if the preferred launcher is from the CDT, the CDT tabs would be added,
while if DSF is the preferred launcher, then its tabs would be added.
Any other debugger can do the same by re-using the launch.
Marc
_______________________________________________
dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
