Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] The Eclipse IDE 2019-06 release is availa

[Frederic Gurr <frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thanks for opening the license agreement bug, we can use it as an
umbrella bug and remind the projects again.

With regards to signing, I'm not sure what the right answer is. It seems
 obvious that the executables should be signed, but we should
double-check that we don't introduce a regression through that.

Placeholder repos:
It's already on my list for "after release day" actions here:
https://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Release_Checklist

With the two placeholder repos you are referring to
https://downloads.eclipse.org/releases/2019-09 and
https://downloads.eclipse.org/staging/2019-09? IIRC, so far there were
only requests for the ../releases/2019-09 repo. Do you also need the
staging repo before M1?

Regards,

Fred

On 19.06.19 17:11, Ed Merks wrote:
> Fred,
> 
> I've opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=548435 but I
> think in the end, this needs to be fixed by multiple different
> projects.  I've previously sent notes outlining the various problems
> between the various versions.
> 
> On https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=548431 there seems to
> be some debate about whether the executables in the p2 repo should be
> signed or not, but I find the discussion kind of bizarre.  Either
> digital signatures of executables are important or they are not, but to
> argue they are only important in the packaged products but not in the p2
> repo is something I simply cannot fathom.  But as I said, if no one
> actually cares, why I should I?
> 
> What I do care about is that it would be nice if we could put in place
> the two placeholder repos for 2019-09 so I can get the setups in place
> for starting the next stream...  Kudos that releases/latest points in
> the right thing already.  :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Ed
> 
> On 19.06.2019 16:14, Frederic Gurr wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your help and your rigorous last minute tests. :)
>>
>> Please create a bug for the user agreement issue.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
>> On 19.06.19 16:11, Ed Merks wrote:
>>> Fred,
>>>
>>> I was successful installing the Eclipse IDE for Java product with the
>>> latest installer, the latest repos, and the latest product catalog.  So
>>> it looks like we've collectively done a good job.
>>>
>>> Maybe for the next release we can better signing in place and reduce the
>>> five different versions of the User Agreement down to just one:
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> On 19.06.2019 16:00, Frederic Gurr wrote:
>>>> The main repository is at
>>>>
>>>>    http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-06/
>>>>
>>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest also points to it)
>>>>
>>>> The EPP (all-in-one) packages are available at
>>>>
>>>>    https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/
>>>>
>>>> The landing page can be found here:
>>>>
>>>>    https://www.eclipse.org/eclipseide/2019-06/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all users, bug reporters, contributors, committers, releng
>>>> engineers and everyone else involved with making this release possible!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Fred
>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

-- 
Frederic Gurr
Release Engineer | Eclipse Foundation Europe GmbH

Annastr. 46, D-64673 Zwingenberg
Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 92821
Managing Directors: Ralph Mueller, Mike Milinkovich, Chris Laroque