Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] "Aggregation model is inconsistent"errors

["David M Williams" <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah, I'm glad this message finally came
through ... it all depends on the "luck of the queue" or something.

BUT, I have reinstalled, and even re-cloned,
and still seeing the same problem with 'categories' in the b3 editor. Does
anyone else? If I select the "validate" action it shows me there
are several features in the Modeling Category that are "un-referenced"
(or something like that). There is about 8 total. I'm not sure if features
were attempted to be removed from the Modeling category? Or if some were
being added? 

In any case, Modeling projects should
be sure to take a look at "staging" repo, to make sure all is
as intended. I think "everything is in" the repository, and this
is just a category issue, since if I pick "validate aggregation"
it passes OK. 

I have opened bug 484518[1] to track
the difference in "results" between various forms of 'validate'.

Thanks

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484518





From:      
 David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To:      
 Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
Date:      
 12/16/2015 05:52 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
"Aggregation model is inconsistent"        errors
Sent by:    
   cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Michael, Yes, I agree that "if
you are going to fail a build, a Gerrit build it the best kind to fail"
... but, still, I wouldn't exactly call it a "good thing" when
someone makes an all too common of an error. 
But, I indeed would not have to "revert" anything in that case,
and that *is* a good thing. :) 

As for the "categories". I was basing my statement on my "local
run" in the b3 aggegator editor and I think I must have something
wrong with my install, so I will try to fix that up today to avoid future
false alarms. 

Thanks, 



From:        Mickael
Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        12/16/2015
04:02 AM
Subject:        Re:
[cross-project-issues-dev] "Aggregation model is inconsistent"
errors
Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On 12/16/2015 09:39 AM, David M Williams wrote:
As of right now, the 'head' of the model is breaking due to invalid "categories"
and the "Gerrit job" is breaking due to invalid "contacts".
@David:
As far as I can see, the failing Gerrit job is a good thing, since it did
vote -1 on an ongoing review, and it helped the other to fix their contribution
before they could merge it.
Where is the CI job highlighting that HEAD is breaking? I'm on https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.neon.runaggregator.BUILD__CLEAN/and
everything is green.

@All:
Like many are already doing, even if you're a SimRel committer and if you're
using the simrel model editor, it's always a good idea to take advantage
of the validation step offered by Gerrit: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Simrel/Contributing_to_Simrel_Aggregation_Build#Contribute_via_a_Gerrit_review.
When pushing to Gerrit, the model is automatically validated and you get
a -1 when the model is broken (because of your change, or an earlier one
on your branch but that 2nd case isn't frequent), then you can amend your
patch and submit it again until you get a +1 and permission to merge via
Gerrit if everything seems good. This workflow prevents from breaking "production"
branches.
-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss,
by Red Hat
My
blog - My
Tweets_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev