Konstantine, 
     
    You definitely get my big thumbs up for stepping up to prevent
    starvation! Unfortunately you also get my big thumbs down for the
    big box of sugar coated candies that tend to make children sick. I
    don't doubt at all that  your intentions are good.  Also, as the
    sole active committer on several projects, I can 100% empathize with
    your plight.  I am also sensitive to the fact that no good deed goes
    unpunished: no matter how hard one tries to do good things, someone
    will rag on it.  It's quite demoralizing so we must learn to keep
    the negaholics at bay.  You have my sympathy... 
     
    I do kindly, respectfully, and formally ask you to reconsider this
    disruptive move with DTP.    Major version increments are
    justifiable only as they relate to breakage of API, which is not the
    case here.  As participants on the release train and as leaders of
    our development communities we should (must) carefully consider the
    impact of our actions.   In this case, your actions are needlessly
    disruptive.  They fly in the face of the documented processes, and
    do so over the objections of other community leaders.  Please,
    please, please reconsider... 
     
    For those who will rail about Konstantine's right to do as he
    believes best, please don't turn this into an issue about
    "rights".   Yes of course Konstantine is free to break API.  Let's
    not belabor that point.  I too am free to break API for EMF, but I
    also know that it's an absolute no go for my community, so I live
    with the burden imposed by the restriction and continue to work on
    the fundamentally thankless task of making sure that everything I do
    is not disruptive and therefore mostly unnoticed.  Our community
    must stand up for individual rights, but anarchy is no solution... 
     
    Note that I will not change the build for EMF ODA to build against
    the version-bumped DTP ODA bundles, so the EMF bundles will continue
    to exclude API breaking versions of DTP ODA.  It's up to the DTP
    project to version their bundles semantically to reflect true API
    breakage.  If anyone has a problem with this, I regretfully offer to
    withdraw the EMF ODA feature from the train. 
     
    Regards, 
    Ed 
     
    On 29/10/2015 5:05 PM, Erdal Karaca
      wrote: 
     
    
      
        
          
            I think Konstantin has adopted an orphan (that is about
              to starve). 
             
            By incrementing the major version Konstantin is expressing
            that he is going to invest a lot of (mental) energy to
            prevent the child from starvation.
            
            
          @Konstantin: What do you need to keep the major version number
          as-is?
          
        @Community: How else could you express your gratitude to
        Konstantin for what he is doing?
         
       
       
      
       
      _______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
     
     
  
 |