[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] m2e ponders participation in luna
|
Wasn't there another deadline in February for new CQ submissions?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12/16/2013, 9:36, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 12/16/2013, 4:16, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
On 15/12/2013 11:06 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Problem is, maven 3.1.x includes Eclipse Aether and
Eclipse Sisu binaries, both currently under incubation as
eclipse
technology project.
What I don't understand is that if these projects are mature
enough to
be included in production versions of Maven, why don't you
simply ask
the projects to do a Release Review to get to Mature status?
It's not
that much work.
I am not sure if the two projects pass "diversity" criterion, see [1]
and [2] git stats for example.
Even if the two projects do get their respective "mature" release in
next few weeks, this will not give us enough time to integrate them into
Maven, release new version of Maven and integrate the new version of
Maven into m2e before Luna IP deadline, which I assume is in two months
or so.
[1]
http://git.eclipse.org/c/__aether/aether-core.git/stats/?__period=q&ofs=10
<http://git.eclipse.org/c/aether/aether-core.git/stats/?period=q&ofs=10>
[2]
http://git.eclipse.org/c/sisu/__org.eclipse.sisu.inject.git/__stats/?period=q&ofs=10
<http://git.eclipse.org/c/sisu/org.eclipse.sisu.inject.git/stats/?period=q&ofs=10>
last year the IP log deadline for Kepler was on May 24
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg08897.html
--
Matthias
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
