Ian,
Comments below.
On 03/09/2013 3:01 AM, Ian Bull wrote:
Actually I think it's healthy, though somewhat heated discussion....
Thanks for the kind words.
I agree that John is 100% correct on this issue and I, along with my
committers, too reserve the right to make such decisions for EMF.
I'm just pointing out that this is just one facet of the coin (or
more like a die than a coin with many facets)...
Actually I doubt we really have a fundamentally different view.
John is a very nice person and there are few I respect more than him
in our community. He has an exemplary track record.
I'm confident that John will do what's right for the Eclipse
platform and for the community.
In the end I must agree with the point you reiterate above. It's
John's right, and the committer's right, to do with the Eclipse
project what they feel is best for the Eclipse project. I trust
they will take other obligations into consideration and am reminding
them what those obligations are. We definitely don't need some
external body acting as an enforcer, though moderators such as
yourself are always a welcome addition.
Yes, don't take the commentary
personally. In principle it's an interesting idea.
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
|