[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pre-M1 Aggregation Repository
|
Again, I am not arguing against building with individual dependency
repositories. All I am saying there is currently no convenient way to do
this and I don't have the time&resources to maintain such fine-grained
dependency configuration. I am particularly concerned about two problems.
First, I need to find location of proper dependency versions to build
for luna, kepler and juno (we have N-1 compatibility policy). Second, I
need a way to know if these dependency repositories go stale and need to
be updated.
One way to address these is to require each participating project
provide separate repository URL they recommend for use as build target
for each yearly release and make list of these URLs documented somewhere.
This still does not solve the problem of reproducible builds, but I
don't it's possible to have reproducible builds and build against latest
versions of dependencies at the same time, i.e. these two requirements
are mutually exclusive.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-21 12:51 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Note that due to Equinox changes in Luna M1, this is a particularly
dangerous time to not be building with Luna components when contributing to
Luna.
One of the primary reasons that it is bad to build against Luna simrel repo
as opposed to particular builds of all dependencies is that an in-progress
simrel repo is a moving target. This breaks a fundamental releng tenet by
making builds not reproducible and requires the project team to remember to
manually trigger a build just before contributing or risk contributing
something built with stale dependencies. Note that these issue can be fixed
quite easily by producing versioned simrel repos that are never modified...
Doing this will not address all issues with using simrel repo as a build
target, but it will make such strategy less fraught with problems.
- Konstantin
-----Original Message-----
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:36 AM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pre-M1 Aggregation Repository
Theoretically, yes, it does open possibility for bad things to happen.
In practice, however, this worked for us for last three releases. If there
was an easy way to consume current simrel dependencies from the build, I'd
certainly do it, but I am not willing to spend any time on this when
building against previous simrel repo works good enough.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-21 10:08 AM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I'm with David on this one. The simrel repo is supposed to be the
aggregation of all the project builds. If you are building against an
old simrel repo, chances are you aren't building against the bits that
will appear with your bits in this round's simrel repo. Doesn't that
open up the potential for bad things?
Doug.
On 13-08-21 7:29 AM, "Igor Fedorenko" <ifedorenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I did the same, too. I simply don't have the time needed to maintain
list of project-level repositories and will build against kepler
until I can switch to luna simrel repo.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-21 4:05 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote:
Maybe it would help if project could publish a (stable) URL of their
latest Luna artifacts on a common wiki page? I had trouble to find
all dependencies and features to set up our target platform
accordingly two weeks ago. So decided to build the software against
Kepler instead.
Best,
Marcel
On Aug 21, 2013, at 9:57 AM, David M Williams
<david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yes, has been discussed before, and I said "bad idea", because
anyone building for the Luna repository, should not be building
against the Luna repository.
From: Eike Stepper <stepper@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 08/21/2013 03:49 AM
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pre-M1 Aggregation Repository
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Hi,
I noticed that an empty Luna repository had been created some time
after the release of Kepler. An empty repository is not really
useful as a source for build dependencies and I wondered if it
would make sense in the future to seed the new repository with the
old content. Would it? Has it been discussed already?
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de <http://www.esc-net.de/>
http://thegordian.blogspot.com <http://thegordian.blogspot.com/>
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev