| Do we have EPP packages based on those builds? Would those packages include the changes discussed earlier wrt the inclusion of slf4j bundles. On 2010-09-09, at 11:16 AM, David M Williams wrote: Thanks Kim (and John) .... that seemed
to do the trick and we actually got a green build on the first try! Hopefully
that's give others (especially all the +3 teams) to finish up on time today.
I did promote the successful build to
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/maintenance/
so some preliminary packages could be
created by end of today and some early repo testing done, for those teams
that want/need to do that.
- - - - - -
> Plus, there's been no comment in
bug 324419
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324419
> which was blocking LinuxTools from contributing last week.
There has at least been some comments
in this bug now ... there's not an obvious solution yet, but we'll see
if we can come up with something to get LinuxTools back on the train.
- - - - - -
@Beth
> When is the aggregation of the
repo likely to run?
Already happened ... at least the rep
creation, if that's what you meant. Others will be kicked off within 15
minutes of someone committing a change to the b3aggrcon file.
(If I am missing the point of your question,
feel free to ask again).
Thanks everyone .. maybe there's hope
after all :)
From:
Kim Moir <Kim_Moir@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
09/09/2010 09:22 AM
Subject:
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
Status and outlook for SR1 RC3 -- are we in
trouble yet?
Sent by:
cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I've cleaned up our repo. David, if you could try another build that
would be great. The content in our aggregator files has not changed.
Kim
The Eclipse and Equinox features are consistent from my parsing of the
metadata for the last few builds. However there is an older version of
"org.eclipse.equinox.server.p2"
being picked up by the aggregation that doesn't match what is in the latest
platform build. I think we should be discarding our old builds that are
still hanging around in our repository because somebody is picking them
up. I'll chat with Kim about it.
Yes, I think we are in trouble. We haven't had a good build in two days.
I'll admit Monday was a holiday for a lot of people .... but ... it's now
Thursday ... +3 day!
I didn't pay much attention to the failures at first, expecting them to
be fixed soon, but I think they may have all been similar to the latest
one, see summary notice attached below or full console log at
https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/helios.runAggregator/345/console
It appears that Eclipse platform and Equinox have some inconsistencies?
(In a brief note from Kim, she thought it might be related to features
losing their distinctive version qualifier suffix (bug 208143 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=208143)
and she was hoping "the next build" would fix that. Apparently
not?
What scares me is once Eclipse/Equinox is fixed, I'm sure there will be
several more issues, as there often is with Jetty and RAP having exact
dependency versions ... hopefully they can react quickly, if that's still
the case.
Plus, there's been no comment in bug 324419
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324419
which was blocking LinuxTools from contributing last week.
By all rights, if we are on day +3 and the day +0 contributions have not
built yet, the whole schedule slips out 2 or 3 days.
I am hoping we can avoid that. Perhaps if we all get out of "holiday
mode" and focus on the simultaneous release builds on Thursday we
can recover? Let's assess schedule changes at the end of Thursday (or early
Friday).
Thank you .... and good luck!
----- Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 09/08/2010 11:39 PM
-----
From: David
M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: Kim
Moir <kmoir@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David
M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Date: 09/08/2010
04:51 PM
Subject: [HeliosAggregation]
Failed for build 2010-09-08_16-46-02
The following errors occured when building Helios:
Software being installed: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0
Only one of the following can be installed at once: [org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
1.1.1.R36x_v20100901, org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository 1.1.1.R36x_v20100823,
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository 1.1.0.v20100513]
Cannot satisfy dependency: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0
depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.sdk.feature.group 3.6.1.r361_v20100903-7H7R07v8rtOZyYbv1I6aZgou5z07
Cannot satisfy dependency: all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0
depends on: org.eclipse.sdk.ide 3.6.1.M20100908-0800
Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.user.ui.feature.group
2.0.1.r361_v20100903-897HFZFFZRuSD2LMtVxyz0Vr depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
[1.1.1.R36x_v20100901]
Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.equinox.sdk.feature.group 3.6.1.r361_v20100903-7H7R07v8rtOZyYbv1I6aZgou5z07
depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.serverside.sdk.feature.group [3.6.0.v20100421-7u7NFVgFN5JdPKPhDHd_6Yqc54uw]
Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.equinox.server.p2.feature.group
1.0.0.v20100503-7x7IFGOFQ74dz0POCNUBj98N depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
[1.1.1.R36x_v20100823]
Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.equinox.serverside.sdk.feature.group
3.6.0.v20100421-7u7NFVgFN5JdPKPhDHd_6Yqc54uw depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.server.p2.feature.group
[1.0.0.v20100503-7x7IFGOFQ74dz0POCNUBj98N]
Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.sdk.ide 3.6.1.M20100908-0800 depends
on: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.user.ui.feature.group [2.0.1.r361_v20100903-897HFZFFZRuSD2LMtVxyz0Vr]
Check the log file for more information: https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/helios.runAggregator/345/console
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
|
