[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Respin RC4 or Test Spin Request
|
Yes, rebuilding just the Modeling Package would be my proposal as well, and if no one objects I will do so if/when I see a successful build in /releases/staging
Markus
On 10 June 2010 19:51, David M Williams
<david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Ed. I approve so ecoretools can
(try) and re-join the train.
I'll start the rebuild approximately
2 pm eastern. I would expect it to complete approx. 4 pm eastern.
We will count this as the first "on
demand exception" for final builds. But, if it is successful (early
enough), I will promote to staging, and
roll out that new version of staging
to mirrors for our official RC4 common site. I'd suggest that only the
modeling EPP package
be rebuilt, if that's possible? [But,
that's up to Markus, and I'm very open to suggestions ,,, but, we should
be explicit].
Keep in mind, if anyone has changed
anything in their repos, the build might still fail (for reasons unrelated
to ecoretools)
and any other project will (still) be
expected to fix any issues immediately (e.g. with an hour or so). (See
bug
316501 for
an example of a pesky project, web tools,
changing their repo :) ... just being open and honest.
So ... let's set a deadline ... if we
have not gotten a good respin by, say, 9 PM Eastern, then RC4 will remain
as it is. And the
modeling epp package will be built without
it? Sound reasonable? I'd still be willing to work on a "final rebuild"
that includes ecoretools ...
but am reluctant to stay up all night
baby-sitting it like last night. :)
Thanks everyone, good luck.
David,
Given the issues with bad bits in the RC4 Ecore Tools build, and potentially
even bad (though unreported) bits in RC3 build, it would seem like a good
thing to respin RC4 or at least do a test spin to ensure that the final
release builds will be problem free. The Amalgamation Modeling depends
on Ecore Tools so testing that this package is properly produced is especially
important.
For those interested, please see this bugzilla for the details:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=316412
Regards,
Ed_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
