Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SDK's on Galileo?

[brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx]

Hey Martin...

The SDK version in DTP's case includes
source. The non-SDK version in DTP's case does not. And we really don't
have a "runtime" component persay.

There's an open bug on our side for
discussing our current distribution (i.e. SDK = source, non-SDK = no source)
to add a third option (frameworks or runtime) that doesn't include source
or any of the tools for developing DTP extensions. But that didn't get
anywhere for this release.

--Fitz

Brian Fitzpatrick
Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/11/2009 07:19 AM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[cross-project-issues-dev] SDK's on Galileo?

Hi all,
 
I notice that there is "PDT SDK"
and "DTP SDK" on Galileo, but not the corresponding runtimes.
 
As an end user, I'm not interested in the
SDK bits of PDT and DTP. Could you folks contribute the
runtime features as well?
 
I remember that in Ganymede, we tried to
avoid SDK's on the coordinated site. Is there any 
guideline for SDK's on Galileo? I'd propose
a guideline that just contributing an SDK without
the respective runtime should be deprecated.
 
Thoughts?
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior
Member of Technical Staff, Wind
River
Target Management Project Lead,
DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 _______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev