Don / Joel,
Any thoughts from the Compuware perspective in regards to COSMOS
2.0?
Team,
Any input from any other COSMOS participants?
Thanks,
Jimmy
Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mohsin, Jimmy
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:43 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: [cosmos-dev] What will COSMOS 2.0 be?
David,
Thanks for posting the minutes so promptly…
All,
Please review the item about COSMOS 2.0. To re-reiterate,
we are now in COSMOS 1.0 adoption mode, given that the core of 1.0 development
work is nearing completion. Over the next 2 months or so, it would be
important to determine where COSMOS 2.0 is headed (AT LEAST at a high level);
as this will allow us to plan our post 1.0 activities at this end. As
David captured so eloquently, SML tooling and a reference implementation for a
TBD Information Model (that will come from somewhere else) could be interesting
items for 2.0
Thanks,
Jimmy
Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:02 AM
To: cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cosmos-dev] Arch Call meeting minutes posted
Please review
and correct as appropriate:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Cosmos_Architecture_Meeting_17-July-08#Meeting_Minutes
David
---
David Whiteman | Tivoli Autonomic Computing
Eclipse COSMOS project committer | http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/
david_whiteman@xxxxxxxxxx | 919-254-8224 | T/L 444-8224