Tania,
May I request 45 minutes for the
items below in this week’s Summit?
All,
In reference to item 1 below, some questions
to think about:
1a. What
is the scope of an Open Source Information Model? How does it jive with
the Reconciliation Taxonomies we have talked about earlier?
1b. What
role will SML play in this regard? Can it be THE building block for this
effort?
1c. What
will the role of CMDBf be in this space? Can we say that CMDBf is THE
information model for configuration data?
1d. This
is obviously a VERY difficult (yet high value) requirements; we also need to
think about how we can phase it into Open Source, assuming this is something we
even want to do…
Thanks,
Jimmy Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mohsin, Jimmy
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:29 AM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: [cosmos-dev] Some post COSMOS 1.0 items
Team,
Some of my random thoughts for COSMOS 1.1 and beyond…
1.
Semantic or Information
model AND/OR Reconciliation taxonomies
2.
These are nebulous
deliverables, but we got to start somewhere J
3.
Security design AND
reference implementation(s)
4.
Further support for
CMDBf
5.
i18n
6.
Well defined COSMOS
install & upgrade approach / paradigm / tooling
7.
I state this since I
doubt if we will be able complete this by June end for COSMOS 1.0
8.
Management capabilities
for core COSMOS components (i.e. for the Domain and the Broker)
9.
Support for multiple
instances and types of Brokers
Any other wild ideas / thoughts prior to this month’s
summit?
BTW, yesterday, we spoke about COSMOS 1.1 for November 2008;
is that the only future release on the cards today? Or is there something
beyond 1.1?
Thanks,
Jimmy
Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703