[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
|
I have checked in the changes in CVS.
The COSMOS framework code has been refactored to use the new annoations
in the ME subproject. You will need to extract the two modules from
ME to compile the lastest data collection code. I will work with
Jagmit to change the build accordingly.
Regards,
_________________________
Hubert Leung
IBM Toronto Lab
hkyleung@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3382
"Hawkins, Joel"
<Joel.Hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/30/2008 10:55 AM
Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Cosmos Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data
in WSDL 215123 |
|
Code is checked in under 215123.
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hubert H Leung
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:58 AM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Hi Bill,
I have migrated the data manager code to use the new annotations (cosmos.me*).
It's using a newer version of the annotation code than what's in
CVS. So Joel will need to check in his changes too. I will
check in the code after the architecture call, just to make sure we have
a good integration build. My checkins will cause the build to break.
I will open a bug for Jagmit to update the build.
The migration to the new annotation code is not complete. I have
only tested the query API so far. But I can check in the code now
to support incremental check in approach.
Regards,
_________________________
Hubert Leung
IBM Toronto Lab
hkyleung@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3382
"Muldoon, William
H" <William.Muldoon@xxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/30/2008 09:30 AM
Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Cosmos Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data
in WSDL 215123 |
|
Joel
I’m using the ExampleMDR, which
is built using the IDataManager interface.
I think the problem is that our
Data Managers are still using the “old” annotations (in cosmos.dc.*)
while the new policy provider capability requires the “new” annotations
(in cosmos.me.*). So we need to convert to the new annotations and deprecate
the old annotations, correct? If so, do you already have code “pending
check-in” for this conversion?
Regards
Bill
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hawkins, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:25 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Bill,
Look at the test case for policy. You need to implement that policy provider
interface on one of your capabilities. Is the cmdbf code checked in? I
can take a look at your resource implementation to see what you’ve got.
Cheers,
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Muldoon, William H
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:06 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Joel
I’ve setup the ExampleMDR with
the new metadata interface under OSGI. The client code is simply:
MetadataExchangeClient mex = new
MetadataExchangeClient(eprDataManager);
Element result = mex.getWSDL();
WSDL is returned (see attachment)
but it doesn’t include the metadata. I see this on the example mdr osgi
console (so I reached the server side):
osgi> SOAP:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wsx:GetMetadata xmlns:wsx="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex">
<wsx:Dialect>http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/</wsx:Dialect>
</wsx:GetMetadata>
But the new code in your patch
is never reached. Any ideas why?
Regards
Bill
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hawkins, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:17 AM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Bill,
JAX-WS allows you to specify a wsdl location in the webservice annotation,
and I’m guessing that this is used by the JAX-WS implementation to sew
up the location in order to respond to a ?wsdl call, or whatever mechanism
the JAX-WS implementation chooses to expose. I think our stance should
be that the client retrieves the wsdl in a container-specific way, as the
spec takes no stance on the matter.
The rest of the design looks good – now I need to check that I’m actually
able to deliver the wsdl to Axis2! ;-)
Cheers,
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Muldoon, William H
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 5:35 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Joel
I’ve updated the design page
at http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_Design_215123.
Please review that it matches your patch. I wasn’t sure about WSDL in
JAX-WS so I left it as an open issue.
Thanks
Bill
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hawkins, Joel
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:12 AM
To: Muldoon, William H
Cc: Cosmos Dev
Subject: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Hey Bill – sure, patch is attached:
You can look at the fixtures for the test case to see how to use it. If
you’re happy with it, we’ll commit it as soon as i9 opens.
Cheers,
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: Muldoon, William H [mailto:William.Muldoon@xxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:01 PM
To: Hawkins, Joel
Subject: RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Joel
I think you’re right. Better
wait until the i8 build is officially blessed.
Meanwhile if it’s not too much
trouble, can you send me a patch?
Thanks
Bill
From: Hawkins, Joel [mailto:Joel.Hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:43 PM
To: Muldoon, William H
Subject: RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Is it OK to check stuff in? I was holding out until i8 was out the door…
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
and then destroy it.
From: Muldoon, William H [mailto:William.Muldoon@xxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Hawkins, Joel
Subject: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123
Hi
Joel
Have
you made any progress with the IPolicyAssertion support in the
Contribution
Manager that was discussed for
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=215123?
If
not, I can make
the changes (just point
me in the right direction in the code).
Regards
Bill
_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev