[cosmos-dev] Reminder: Your input is needed - Criteria for QA for i9 (in

[Tania N Makins <tmakins@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Team,

We still have many open questions on
the QA criteria.  It is key that we agree on this criteria and that
Shivy has an opportunity to finalize the QA plan before we start i9.  If
you have not already done so, review the wiki page and provide your input:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_QA_Criteria.

Thanks,

     Tania N. Makins, PMP®
     Project Manager, AC Open Source Components
     IBM Software Group - RTP, NC
     Office: (919) 254-8430  T/L: 444-8430
     tmakins@xxxxxxxxxx

Mark D Weitzel/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/09/2008 08:49 AM

Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [cosmos-dev] RE: Criteria for QA for i9 (inclusive) onwards

Jimmy, 

A few comments.... 

On the API issue, I think we should link to the Eclipse API guidelines--we
want to be very clear that this is part of what is governing our coding
practices.  On the cosmos development  process page, we talk
about what it takes to exit an interation.  I think it would be good
to tie that information in the section for the milestones.  I would
like to see these same things apply for each iteration and not just 1.0.

-mw

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mark Weitzel | STSM | IBM Software Group | Tivoli | Autonomic Computing
| (919) 543 0625 | weitzelm@xxxxxxxxxx

[cosmos-dev] RE: Criteria for QA for i9 (inclusive) onwards

Mohsin, Jimmy

to:

Ali Mehregani, N, Shivashankari

01/08/08 01:59 AM

Sent by:	cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:	Cosmos Dev

Please respond to Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Ali, 
Thanks for your input on this issue.  This now lives in bugzilla as
ER 214576 and has an associated page
located at http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_QA_Criteria.
 I basically turned the PPT I circulated earlier into this wiki page.
 Please feel free to update this wiki page directly if you have further
comments. 
  
Shivvy, 
Can you please update this wiki page to address Ali’s point in regard
to system level test cases? 
  
Thanks, 
Jimmy Mohsin 
Cell   +1-609-635-1703
  
From: Ali Mehregani [mailto:amehrega@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:36 PM
To: Mohsin, Jimmy
Subject: Re: Fwd: [cosmos-dev] Criteria for QA for i9 (inclusive) onwards
  

Thanks Jimmy for putting together an exiting criteria.  I agree with
all your points.   
One suggestion:  I'm not sure how the system level test cases are
currently captured.  We can use TPTP manual test suites to capture
all test cases and generate reports based on their verdict.

Thanks, 

Ali Mehregani 
Phone Number: (905) 413-3712 
Service Modeling Language - COSMOS 
http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/

"Ali Mehregani" <ali.mehregani@xxxxxxxxx>

04/01/2008 12:25 PM

To	Ali Mehregani/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
Subject	Fwd: [cosmos-dev] Criteria for QA for i9 (inclusive) onwards

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mohsin, Jimmy <Jimmy.Mohsin@xxxxxx>
Date: Jan 4, 2008 10:43 AM 
Subject: [cosmos-dev] Criteria for QA for i9 (inclusive) onwards
To: Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Team,

 

Please review and provide input to the attached PPT.  The intent is to FIRMLY establish the criteria that Shivvy and team can use to establish the QA gates for COSMOS; starting with i9.

 

Thanks,

Jimmy Mohsin

Cell   +1-609-635-1703

 

_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev




--
Ali Mehregani
COSMOS Project
http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/ [attachment "COSMOS 1.0 QA Criteria.ppt" deleted by Ali Mehregani/Toronto/IBM] _______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev