Tania,
214805
now belongs to Rich Vasconi and read “Validate organization and
completeness of Adopter Collateral and Documentation Set for COSMOS 1.0”.
OK..
Documentation ERs will go to “cosmos.web”.
However,
what do you think about adding “cosmos.qa” as an option to the
Component field?
Thanks,
Jimmy Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tania N Makins
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:11 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: Re: [cosmos-dev] Additional values in the Component field for
ERs
Shouldn't we be
using "cosmos.web" for documentation ERs?
Which reminds
me...Rich Vasconi, our Information Development lead, is reviewing the suggested table of
contents
for our documentation and will be creating a template for authors to use for
consistency and flow. He will also be drafting an ID plan to review with
the Community. So, I think it makes sense for 214805 to be assigned to
him. Any bugs assigned to "cosmos.web" go to Rich by default.
Tania
Tania N. Makins, PMP®
Project Manager, AC Open Source Components
IBM Software Group - RTP, NC
Office: (919) 254-8430 T/L: 444-8430
tmakins@xxxxxxxxxx
|
"Mohsin,
Jimmy" <Jimmy.Mohsin@xxxxxx>
Sent by:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/09/2008
03:50 PM
|
Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"Cosmos
Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[cosmos-dev]
Additional values in the Component field for ERs
|
|
Team,
I propose that we add two new
values in the “Component” field in the ER form. These values
are “cosmos.qa” and “cosmos.doc”.
Currently, I have been (ab)using
the “cosmos.build” for the QA and Documentation centric ERs.
Thanks,
Jimmy Mohsin
Cell
+1-609-635-1703
_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev
