Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cosmos-dev] Re: COSMOS download page


Thanks, Bjorn.  Just to clarify, it is also our understanding that, even though we are working toward a release of 1.0 next year, since we are not yet a top level project and are still incubating, then we cannot use the 1.0Mx naming convention either.  Therefore, I assume we will just need to go with Mx (or ix for iteration builds between milestones) without a version number prefix to name our stable builds.  Is this correct?

David



Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/18/2007 01:25 PM

Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[cosmos-dev] Re: COSMOS download page





David and the rest of the COSMOS team,
I'm sitting on an airplane, catching up on my email reading, and I found this message.
Unfortunately, you may not use the 0.x naming for milestones. Under the Eclipse Development Process, 0.x (and N.x) naming is for official releases - releases that have been reviewed under the IP process and through a community Release Review. Interim milestones are named 0.xMy, e.g., 0.4M2 if you have complete milestone 2 working towards release 0.4 or 1.0M2 if you have completed milestone 2 working towards release 1.0.

Thank you in advance for taking the time to change your download page (and build system?) to conform with the Eclipse naming scheme. (It is important that we keep the semantic meaning of 0.x and N.x consistent for our larger Eclipse community - thanks.)

- Bjorn
Subject: [cosmos-dev] COSMOS downloads page
From: David Whiteman <David_Whiteman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:34:14 -0400

To: "Cosmos Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>



I see that we have the i5 stable build featured on the page
http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/downloads/ on the first tab as the latest release.  Do we want each stable iteration build to be featured that way, or just the milestone builds?  Also, I had thought at least we were reserving the Release 0.x naming for milestones?

I guess I was expecting the first tab to say Release 0.4 until the end of milestone 2, at which point we would have Release 0.7 featured.


Thoughts?


David



_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev


Back to the top