Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE

[Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I meant that they were originally planned to be done for Java EE 8, via the JCP. So there was nothing to transition ;)

It's a past statement. I don't think there is much value to discuss what might have been included in Java EE 8.

I disagree with forking and changing namespaces. It is unnecessary and causes unnecessary migration.

I also disagree with two configs existing in both Jakarta and MicroProfile. It is a recipe for confusion and disaster.

I think moving MP Config to Jakarta while retaining the same namespace is a better option.

Thanks

Emily

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:21 PM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:43 PM Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, many and APIs were not intended to ever transition to the JCP. 

I meant that they were originally planned to be done for Java EE 8, via the JCP. So there was nothing to transition ;)

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

 

_______________________________________________
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance

--

Thanks
Emily