Re: [che-dev] Development quality and transparency

[Sergii Kabashniuk <skabashn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:13 AM <tmader@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 10:57 +0200, Gennady Azarenkov wrote:

Normally, approval of one or more Maintainer (Code Owner) is needed. 

We really should review the list of maintainers. I doubt Anatolii Bazko wants to review code automation PR's.

If he is codeowner that means that he was an author/maintainer of that code in the past.

And what does it mean "wants"? If he doesn't want  - who want? Should we throw away or deprecated that code?

What Anatolii think about this?

 

Btw: code owner is not mentioned in the dev process doc except as a technical device.

Do you think that "code owner" role is not needed at all? Or you want to contribute some clarifications in https://github.com/eclipse/che/wiki/Development-Workflow#pull-requests?

/Thomas

_______________________________________________
che-dev mailing list
che-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/che-dev

--

Sergii Kabashniuk

Principal Software Engineer, DevTools 

Red Hat Ukraine

skabashniuk@xxxxxxxxxx