Re: [che-dev] Long-lived Branches / PRs

[Thomas Mäder <tmader@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tyler,

On 09.04.2017 17:49, Tyler Jewell wrote:
> Another scenario is that we have had some PRs opened which challenges 
> the design of the system - either alters the original design intent, 
> affects the infrastructure, or alters the usability of the system. 
> When these PRs are tied to specifications that were drafted and 
> reviewed, the adoption path is clear. However, if the PRs both 
> introduce the concept and provide an implementation, then it is harder 
> to manage the PR as maintainers wrestle with deciding on whether the 
> alteration is a good change and with the maintainability of the code.

Can you give an example of suche a PR? I'd like to understand what kind 
of stuff you're referring to. Also, what do you propose as a path to 
introducing such changes?

/Thomas