Hi Sathish,
glad that you are able to use Californium to your advantage
J
Regarding CoMI support in Californium:
I had never heard of CoMI before you raised the question, but from glancing over the RFC draft my understanding is that CoMI operates at the “application
layer” from a CoAP (and thus Californium’s) standpoint. Thus, a CoMI “adapter” (not sure what you mean by that, a CoMI message en-/decoder?) would probably not be part of Californium but would need to be implemented as a separate component in a similar way
as leshan (a LWM2M implementation) is implemented on top of Californium. So far, I have not heard of any plans for a CoMI implementation within the Californium nor the eclipse IoT community.
But maybe you want to initiate a new open source project providing a CoMI implementation ;-)?
Regards,
Kai
From: cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sathish Kumar Selvaraj
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 3:40 PM
To: cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cf-dev] Reg COMI Adapter
I've been using Californium CoAP Java framework(Cf) and Copper(Cu) for a while for my CoAP protocol implementations. It is a lot helpful to me. It is easier to integrate and use in the application.
And i have the following questions for you regarding COMI adapter
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/?include_text=1
Do you guys have any plan to provide adapter for COMI?
I need to handle COMI response from 6LoWPAN devices, for which I'm looking for suitable adapter.
I'm eagerly waiting for your suggestions.
TIA,
Sathish