[cdt-dev] Is an API Baseline update to Neon.3 ok?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] Is an API Baseline update to Neon.3 ok?

From: Liviu Ionescu <ilg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:01:11 +0300
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm considering a major update of the GNU ARM Eclipse plug-ins, right now compatible with Luna.2 (API Baseline CDT 8.6.0, but code actually even older, with hundreds of deprecation warnings). Given the recent changes in CDT, I'd skip Mars entirely and go directly to Neon.3, CDT 9.2.1.

Any thought/suggestions?


Regards,

Liviu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is an API Baseline update to Neon.3 ok?
  - From: Jonah Graham

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 9.3 Oxygen M7 posted
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Is an API Baseline update to Neon.3 ok?
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] CDT 9.3 Oxygen M7 posted
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Is an API Baseline update to Neon.3 ok?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs