Re: [cdt-dev] Proposed change in thread naming

[Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>]

In this case second set square brackets really don't add anything,so it really becomes #1. Which is fine with me too, since it is what we show now anyway :)

Another variant with JDT similar look

5 - 
MyProcess [1530]
  Thread #1 [MyProcess] (Suspended: Container)
  Thread #2 [MyProcess] (Running: Container)
  Thread #3 [Worker] (Suspended: Container)
  Thread #4 [Heartbeat] (Running: Container)

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Marc Dumais <marc.dumais@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/25/2014 09:23 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:

  Thread [Worker-3] (Suspended: Container)
make me think there should be a [Worker-1] and [Worker-2], which is not the case.

I had the same thought, looking at the proposed examples. Maybe it would be more "natural" to have the thread id just after "Thread"? :

4- 
MyProcess [1530]
  Thread [1][MyProcess] (Suspended: Container)
  Thread [2][MyProcess] (Running: Container)
  Thread [3][Worker] (Suspended: Container)
  Thread [4][Heartbeat] (Running: Container)

--

 

 

 

MARC DUMAIS
Software developer

Ericsson
8500 Decarie
Ville Mount-Royal, Qc, Canada
Phone 514 345-7900 x45006
marc.dumais@xxxxxxxxxxxx
www.ericsson.com

 

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev