Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 8.4 Bugs Fixed in this Release

Doug

Le 28/05/2014 20:57, Doug Schaefer a écrit :
We need to find a better way to deal with Cygwin. I don't want Cygwin stuff running at all when not dealing with Cygwin.
I do not quite understand your position. There is nothing from Cygwin stuff running on a non windows platform as checked in the Cygwin.windowsToCygwinPath method.

private static final boolean isWindowsPlatform = Platform.getOS().equals(Platform.OS_WIN32);


public static String windowsToCygwinPath(String windowsPath, String envPath) throws IOException, UnsupportedOperationException {
        if (windowsPath == null || windowsPath.trim().length() == 0)
            return windowsPath;

        if (!isWindowsPlatform) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not a Windows system, Cygwin is unavailable."); //$NON-NLS-1$
        }
        ....
}

Francis
There's too much possibility for things to get messed up in native environments.

I'm not sure what the right answer is, whether as a special Eclipse File System, but something that we can make really optional.

Doug.

________________________________________
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Marc Khouzam [marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:13 PM
To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 8.4 Bugs Fixed in this Release

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Francis ANDRE
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:52 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT 8.4 Bugs Fixed in this Release

Hi

I have noticed that the list of bugs fixed in CDT 8.4 version is empty
-- https://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/User/NewIn84#Bugs_Fixed_in_this_Release
--

Is there a way to know which bugs will be fixed in 8.4?
Is there a way to include a change in this 8.4 release? (I have this one
pending: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/27229/)
Someone familiar with managed build will have to review it.
However, now that we are past RC2, it would have to be a very safe
or very important bug to risk including it.


Rgds

Francis

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev




Back to the top